MapGuide fork of AGG

[Daniel Morissette]

Steve Lime wrote:
> This should be a nice mess, especially if there is a broader community fork of AGG 2.4. I'm curious
> why a fork is even necessary? The RFC doesn't go into any detail. The one piece of code mentioned
> in the thread certainly doesn't necessitate a fork. 
> 

Of course you and others more knowledgeable about the AGG situation than 
myself are welcome to join the discussion on the mapguide-internals list.

Daniel
-- 
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/