[mapserver-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 62 - Support Additional WFS GetFeature Output Formats

[Frank Warmerdam]

Lime, Steve D (DNR) wrote:
> Great addition. Are there any security implications we might anticipate? None come to mind but I think that we should explicitly define a "Security Implications" section as part of all RFCs moving forward- just to make sure. I'm +1 pending the addition of such a section to the RFC.


Steve,

I have added:

"""
Security Implications
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There are no apparent security implications to this proposal.
"""

Of course, what I mean are that there are no security implications
clear to *me*.  I may not be very perceptive about it.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent