[mapserver-users] Map Scale

[Palmer, Steve]

That's about as succinct an explanation as I've heard/seen.

So if the map units were in meters, would one plug in a resolution value of
182.88 pixels per centimeter (72 * 2.54) to derive the scale?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ed McNierney [mailto:ed at topozone.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:58 PM
To: vinko at cprsig.cl; mapserver-users at lists.gis.umn.edu
Subject: RE: [mapserver-users] Map Scale


Vinko -
 
The scale number has no units - a scale ratio, as in "1:25,000" scale.
 
Scale ratios basically make no sense with a digital image, unless you
specify the physical output (display or print) resolution of that image in
pixels per some physical unit.  By default, MapServer assumes that the
output device has a resolution of 72 pixels per inch, and computes the scale
ratio that way.
 
For example, if MapServer generated a line that it knows is 12 miles long
(because MapServer knows such things), and the resulting image is 144 pixels
long (which MapServer also knows since it generated the image), then at 72
pixels per inch the image will be two inches long, which is a scale ratio of
12 miles = 2 inches or 6 miles = 1 inch or 380,160 inches = 1 inch.  That's
a scale of 1:380,160, which is what MapServer will report.
 
You can use the RESOLUTION keyword in the MAP file to change the presumed
output resolution.  Unless you control the output device completely,
reporting the scale as a ratio will never be accurate - but it's what most
users expect, so it's worth doing.
 
     - Ed
 
Ed McNierney
President and Chief Mapmaker
TopoZone.com
ed at topozone.com

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Vinko Vrsalovic [mailto:vinko at cprsig.cl] 
	Sent: Mon 11/11/2002 7:32 PM 
	To: mapserver-users at lists.gis.umn.edu 
	Cc: 
	Subject: [mapserver-users] Map Scale
	
	

	Hello,
	
	I've been looking at the archives, but didn't find a clear
explanation
	about this issue: The scale number shown by Mapserver is measured in
	what? and in what ways it can be useful for output?
	
	Because it doesn't make sense viewing the image, compared to what is
	'normal' in real paper maps.
	
	Thanks,
	--
	Vinko Vrsalovic <el[|- at -|]vinko.cl>
	http://www.cprsig.cl
	

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20021112/7a355c1f/attachment.html