raster : bad quality in output
Fawcett, David
David.Fawcett at STATE.MN.US
Thu Apr 7 07:19:56 PDT 2005
Didrik,
This are you explicitly setting the size of the image on your output html page? If so, does it match the size set in your Map file?
David.
David Fawcett
Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance
david.fawcett at moea.state.mn.us
651.215.0200
-----Original Message-----
From: UMN MapServer Users List [mailto:MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU]On
Behalf Of Didrik Pinte
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:14 AM
To: MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU
Subject: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] raster : bad quality in output
Hi,
I have a problem with rendering rasters...
MapServer output is correct but the rendering is not good. The road
names aren't readable.
When I open the raster file in an image viewer the quality is better.
Raster files are GeoTiff files (pack-bits compression).
They are defined like this in my map file :
LAYER
NAME "F_50000"
STATUS DEFAULT
TILEINDEX "raster/50000.shp"
TYPE RASTER
MAXSCALE 75000
MINSCALE 35001
PROJECTION
"init=epsg:27572"
END
END
The output of Mapserver is PNG24 :
OUTPUTFORMAT
NAME png24
DRIVER "GD/PNG"
MIMETYPE "image/png"
IMAGEMODE RGBA
EXTENSION "png"
FORMATOPTION "INTERLACE=ON"
END
Has someone a great idea on how I can correct that ?
I can put some online samples.
Thanks
Didrik
More information about the MapServer-users
mailing list