WFS bug? - multiple layers from same service

[Godwin, Elizabeth]

Attached is the map file.  The services are all internal, so don't
bother trying to connect to them.  The data being served via WFS is
based on shapfiles, the map file is almost identical to this one, minus
the connection string, metadata info is different.
 
Liz

        -----Original Message-----
        From: UMN MapServer Users List
[mailto:MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU] On Behalf Of Ethan Alpert
        Sent: March 29, 2005 3:29 PM
        To: MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU
        Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] WFS bug? - multiple layers
from same service
	
	
        What's the mapfile look like? Is there a chance that there are
name colisions between the layers?
         
        -e

                -----Original Message-----
                From: UMN MapServer Users List
[mailto:MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU] On Behalf Of Godwin, Elizabeth
                Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 1:24 PM
                To: MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU
                Subject: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] WFS bug? - multiple
layers from same service
        	
        	
                I'm experiencing a wierd phenomenon with a mapfile i am
working with.  It's a bit of a unique case in that the map is composed
of 3 layers, all WFS layers coming from the same service.
                 
                The odd thing is...when I do this...  only the FIRST
layer in the map is drawn, but using the class info from the LAST layer
of this service.  If I draw the middle layer from a different
service...the same is true, except that middle layer draws normal.  So
FIRST is drawing with THIRD styling, on top of SECOND that has it's own
styling.
                 
                In this case, it's polygons, lines and points, so the
polygons are drawing with point symbology on top of lines.  Or if all
are coming from the same service, all that is drawn is polygins with
point symbology.  The last two layers are not drawn.
                 
                I'm working with a cvs version from a month ago or so,
but I also tested against 4.4.0
                 
                Shall I post a bug?  I'm asking first in case I've
overlooked something silly.
                 
                Liz Godwin
                 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20050329/62fc6513/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: shapewfs.map
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2549 bytes
Desc: shapewfs.map
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20050329/62fc6513/attachment.obj>