[mapserver-users] Re: Raster Strategies Examples
Edi.Karadumi
edikaradumi at gmail.com
Thu Aug 19 06:04:29 PDT 2010
Thanx to you my questions are comming to an end
Three more last things
Should i retile the new mosaiced overview? Meaning should i create smaller
size tiles of the new mosaic? or 2Gb is not a problem
And how can i find in which scale should i switch layers? So what will be
the maxscale of the original layer?
if ill still have performance problems, or ill get 1-2 terabytes of data
more should i make another mosaic with 0.08*16 or 0.08*8, or is there
another strategy?
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Frank Warmerdam [via OSGeo.org]
<ml-node+5440051-1962745825-182671 at n2.nabble.com> wrote:
Edi.Karadumi wrote:
> Sorry to bother again, when i use gdal_merge.py the part -ps 160 160,
> thats
> the pixel dimension and i get an image 1kb. The pixel size of the original
> file is 0.08 meters. So i think i should use 0.08x32 in the gdal_merge.py
> command?
Edi,
If the original resolution is 8cm then the 1/32nd overview should indeed
have a pixel size of 0.08x32 or 2.56m.
> And how many tiles should i merge together? Now i have 2T images
> and 2000Gb/32 = 62Gb the rezult image. Should i merge them all together
and
> than recreate tiles? Even if i had 1200gb, 1200/32=37.5gb for an image
not
> 1gb. That is still an image size that cant be handled
Note that the 1/32nd overview is reduced by a factor of 32 in x and y
so overall it will be original_size/(32*32). So 2TB would reduce to
about 1.95GB.
Best regards,
--
--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Raster-Strategies-Examples-tp5363321p5440104.html
Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the MapServer-users
mailing list