[OpenLayers-Dev] RFC: Archiving PSC Votes
Daniel Morissette
dmorissette at mapgears.com
Mon Oct 15 09:00:52 EDT 2007
Cameron Shorter wrote:
> I guess there are different levels of importance for things that are
> voted on.
> For a major design change, or large functionality addition, where
> someone is prepared to write up a RFQ to describe it, the extra effort
> to record the decision at the bottom of the RFQ is relatively minor. Eg:
> "Passed by PSC vote" or "Blocked by Joe Blogs during PSC vote who said
> ...". I'm happy with this.
> It would be more effort to fill in a table ticking off the votes for the
> 15 or so PSC members. While I can see value in this, I don't think the
> value outweighs the annoyance factor this will introduce.
>
For what it's worth, for MapServer, we include a "Voting History"
section at the end of each RFC and fill it as follows... takes only a
few minutes and gives all the info that we need for the posterity:
e.g. http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-31#voting-history
Voting history
+1 from SteveL, SteveW, TomK, FrankW, AssefaY, PericlesN
+0 from JeffM
>
> For minor PSC votes, like "should we release or not", I'm not sure that
> this warrants the effort of transcribing from email to wiki table.
We do not do much to archive minor PSC votes either.
Daniel
--
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/
More information about the Dev
mailing list