[Live-demo] Next Version - Spring 2010
cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Mon Dec 7 18:05:08 PST 2009
Alex Mandel wrote:
> Hamish wrote:
>>> by the end of March 2010, version 2.5? (Maybe we should change
>>> the numbering system?)
>> why the version inflation? what's wrong with calling it 2.1 for
>> an incremental update? AFAIAC that end of things is just fine as-is.
> I was a real guess on the numbers. If each Foss4G disc is upped by one
> whole number than it makes sense that 1,2,2,5,3 would be a logical way
> to number them.
> We are also jumping the underlying distro each time if we do this on an
> every 6 months plan.
> Hence why it might be better to move towards a numbering system based on
> the year.
> But yes we could go with 2.1, and the for Foss4g it would likely be 2.2.
> Live-demo mailing list
> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
For the next LiveDVD release, I'd vote for either 3.x or 2.1.
If we are to build off a new base distribution (Ubuntu 9.10 instead of
9.04) then I'd increase to 3.0 as I consider that a major change.
Geospatial Solutions Manager
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
More information about the Osgeolive