[Live-demo] Re: LiveDVD Copyright Ambiguity - speak up if you have issues

[Johan Van de Wauw]

Definitely don't make it non-commercial. This is a vague term that is hard
to define.

I would suggest that authors give a double license: one which is common for
the whole live dvd, and a second one which is the same as the license of the
software program.

If at any point somebody wants to combine part of the documentation with the
program (eg write a man file) he/she can do it much more easily if the
license is the same.


On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Alex Mandel <tech_dev at wildintellect.com>wrote:

> I wonder if we should also specify share alike. So it would be
> Attribution Share-Alike.
>
> If I recall the controversy was over if it should be Non-commercial and
> I can see how we need to leave that off in order to encourage
> contributions from companies to OSGeo live.
>
> Any objections to making it Attribution Share-Alike?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> On 06/17/2011 03:14 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> > OSGeo-Live authors,
> > It has been picked up that we have not selected a specific CC license.
> > As such, I'm about to update all OSGeo-Live docs to be CC by
> > Attribution, as per below.
> >
> > If you have any objections, please speak up before Monday 20 June.
> >
> > On 15/06/11 08:37, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> >> Which license?
> >> =========
> >> Firstly, in the RST source, the majority of our docs are licensed as
> >> "Creative Commons". As Simon points out, we need to be more specific.
> >> I suggest that we change our template to use the least restrictive of
> >> the Creative Commons licenses, Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
> >> Unported License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/>, and
> >> ask all authors to confirm that we can change their docs to this
> version.
> >>
> >> What reference?
> >> ===========
> >> I suggest that we add the following to our disclaimer.html page:
> >>
> >> The OSGeo-Live documentation  is licensed under a Creative Commons
> >> Attribution 3.0 Unported License
> >> <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/> by the respective
> >> OSGeo-Live authors <http://live.osgeo.org/en/sponsors.html#contributors
> >.
> >>
> >> The software and data included with OSGeo-Live are licenced under
> >> their respective Open Source or other Open license.
> >>
> >> Derivative works?
> >> ===========
> >> I suggest we recommend the following text be included in derivative
> >> works:
> >>
> >> "If incorporating content from the OSGeo-Live project, please
> >> attribute using text similar to:
> >> [This document] incorporates OSGeo-Live documentation, which is owned
> >> by the respective OSGeo-Live authors."
> >>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Live-demo mailing list
> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeolive/attachments/20110618/724de3d9/attachment.html>