[OSGeoLive] Motion: Propose to give Felicity Brand with permission to approve pull requests to OSGeo docs

Angelos Tzotsos gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com
Tue Nov 5 13:33:40 PST 2019


On 11/5/19 8:59 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> Yes, I agree that we should have people review each other's work.
> We are seeing a few different workflows emerge of Felicity's work. 
> Either:
> 1. Felicity provides a pull request for someone else to merge.
> 2. Felicity provides suggestion, someone else applies the changes (and 
> whatever else they do at the same time), and in that case, I'd suggest 
> that Felicity should be doing the merging.
> Would you be ok to vote +1 to enable 2?
> On 6/11/19 12:15 am, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
>> Hi Cameron,
>> I am not against granting Felicity write permissions, but the whole 
>> idea of pull requests is to have a review by someone else before 
>> merging. Felicity can continue working on her own fork (as Vicky did 
>> with the migration to the cmake build system and Transifex) without 
>> needing to merge every change before moving on. At the end we can 
>> review and accept the changes in a big pull request or in smaller ones.
>> Cheers,
>> Angelos
>> On 11/5/19 12:11 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>> Hi OSGeoLive PSC,
>>> Felicity Brand is a senior technical writer reviewing OSGeo 
>>> Quickstarts. To date I've been really impressed with the quality of 
>>> her suggestions and reviews. As such, I'd like to propose that we 
>>> provide Felicity with permissions to accept pull requests to the 
>>> OSGeoLive docs. This will help her be more productive.
>>> +1 Cameron

Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
Charter Member
Open Source Geospatial Foundation

More information about the osgeolive mailing list