[OSGeoLive] Motion: Propose to give Felicity Brand with permission to approve pull requests to OSGeo docs

Angelos Tzotsos gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com
Thu Nov 14 07:35:44 PST 2019

Any more votes on this motion?

On 11/5/19 11:33 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
> +1
> Angelos
> On 11/5/19 8:59 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>> Yes, I agree that we should have people review each other's work.
>> We are seeing a few different workflows emerge of Felicity's work. 
>> Either:
>> 1. Felicity provides a pull request for someone else to merge.
>> 2. Felicity provides suggestion, someone else applies the changes 
>> (and whatever else they do at the same time), and in that case, I'd 
>> suggest that Felicity should be doing the merging.
>> Would you be ok to vote +1 to enable 2?
>> On 6/11/19 12:15 am, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
>>> Hi Cameron,
>>> I am not against granting Felicity write permissions, but the whole 
>>> idea of pull requests is to have a review by someone else before 
>>> merging. Felicity can continue working on her own fork (as Vicky did 
>>> with the migration to the cmake build system and Transifex) without 
>>> needing to merge every change before moving on. At the end we can 
>>> review and accept the changes in a big pull request or in smaller ones.
>>> Cheers,
>>> Angelos
>>> On 11/5/19 12:11 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>> Hi OSGeoLive PSC,
>>>> Felicity Brand is a senior technical writer reviewing OSGeo 
>>>> Quickstarts. To date I've been really impressed with the quality of 
>>>> her suggestions and reviews. As such, I'd like to propose that we 
>>>> provide Felicity with permissions to accept pull requests to the 
>>>> OSGeoLive docs. This will help her be more productive.
>>>> +1 Cameron

Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
Charter Member
Open Source Geospatial Foundation

More information about the osgeolive mailing list