[OSGeoLive] Motion: Propose to give Felicity Brand with permission to approve pull requests to OSGeo docs

[Angelos Tzotsos]

Any more votes on this motion?

On 11/5/19 11:33 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
> +1
> Angelos
>
> On 11/5/19 8:59 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>> Yes, I agree that we should have people review each other's work.
>>
>> We are seeing a few different workflows emerge of Felicity's work. 
>> Either:
>>
>> 1. Felicity provides a pull request for someone else to merge.
>>
>> 2. Felicity provides suggestion, someone else applies the changes 
>> (and whatever else they do at the same time), and in that case, I'd 
>> suggest that Felicity should be doing the merging.
>>
>> Would you be ok to vote +1 to enable 2?
>>
>> On 6/11/19 12:15 am, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
>>> Hi Cameron,
>>>
>>> I am not against granting Felicity write permissions, but the whole 
>>> idea of pull requests is to have a review by someone else before 
>>> merging. Felicity can continue working on her own fork (as Vicky did 
>>> with the migration to the cmake build system and Transifex) without 
>>> needing to merge every change before moving on. At the end we can 
>>> review and accept the changes in a big pull request or in smaller ones.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Angelos
>>>
>>> On 11/5/19 12:11 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>> Hi OSGeoLive PSC,
>>>>
>>>> Felicity Brand is a senior technical writer reviewing OSGeo 
>>>> Quickstarts. To date I've been really impressed with the quality of 
>>>> her suggestions and reviews. As such, I'd like to propose that we 
>>>> provide Felicity with permissions to accept pull requests to the 
>>>> OSGeoLive docs. This will help her be more productive.
>>>>
>>>> +1 Cameron
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
Charter Member
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos