[OSGeoLive] Motion: Propose to give Felicity Brand with permission to approve pull requests to OSGeo docs

[Brian M Hamlin]

+1 Brian

On 11/14/19 7:35 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
> Any more votes on this motion?
>
> On 11/5/19 11:33 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
>> +1
>> Angelos
>>
>> On 11/5/19 8:59 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>> Yes, I agree that we should have people review each other's work.
>>>
>>> We are seeing a few different workflows emerge of Felicity's work. 
>>> Either:
>>>
>>> 1. Felicity provides a pull request for someone else to merge.
>>>
>>> 2. Felicity provides suggestion, someone else applies the changes 
>>> (and whatever else they do at the same time), and in that case, I'd 
>>> suggest that Felicity should be doing the merging.
>>>
>>> Would you be ok to vote +1 to enable 2?
>>>
>>> On 6/11/19 12:15 am, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
>>>> Hi Cameron,
>>>>
>>>> I am not against granting Felicity write permissions, but the whole 
>>>> idea of pull requests is to have a review by someone else before 
>>>> merging. Felicity can continue working on her own fork (as Vicky 
>>>> did with the migration to the cmake build system and Transifex) 
>>>> without needing to merge every change before moving on. At the end 
>>>> we can review and accept the changes in a big pull request or in 
>>>> smaller ones.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Angelos
>>>>
>>>> On 11/5/19 12:11 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>>> Hi OSGeoLive PSC,
>>>>>
>>>>> Felicity Brand is a senior technical writer reviewing OSGeo 
>>>>> Quickstarts. To date I've been really impressed with the quality 
>>>>> of her suggestions and reviews. As such, I'd like to propose that 
>>>>> we provide Felicity with permissions to accept pull requests to 
>>>>> the OSGeoLive docs. This will help her be more productive.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 Cameron
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>