[pdal] pdal pipeline filters.reprojection

[Stephen Mather]

Excellent idea, but I don't think this dataset includes scan angle:
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/3f5f5bbb9a3d55affea168620fbde6f1

"average": 0,
"count": 58768299,
"maximum": 0,
"minimum": 0,
"name": "ScanAngleRank",
"position": 9,
"stddev": 0,
"variance": 0


On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Howard Butler <howard at hobu.co> wrote:

>
> > On Feb 18, 2017, at 7:08 PM, Stephen Mather <stephen at smathermather.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > https://smathermather.com/2017/02/18/taking-slices-from-
> lidar-data-part-viii/
>
> You might use another filters.range to toss out high absolute scan angles,
> and then sample from the set you have left. This will bias your sampling to
> get keep more nadir'y points, which may or may not be what you're going
> after.
>
> Howard
> _______________________________________________
> pdal mailing list
> pdal at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pdal
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pdal/attachments/20170218/115eff39/attachment.html>