[pdal] pdal pipeline filters.reprojection

[Howard Butler]

Are the overlap areas classified? The stats for Classification indicate a range of values...

> On Feb 18, 2017, at 9:23 PM, Stephen Mather <stephen at smathermather.com> wrote:
> 
> Excellent idea, but I don't think this dataset includes scan angle:
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/3f5f5bbb9a3d55affea168620fbde6f1
> 
>         "average": 0,
>         "count": 58768299,
>         "maximum": 0,
>         "minimum": 0,
>         "name": "ScanAngleRank",
>         "position": 9,
>         "stddev": 0,
>         "variance": 0
> 
> 
>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Howard Butler <howard at hobu.co> wrote:
>> 
>> > On Feb 18, 2017, at 7:08 PM, Stephen Mather <stephen at smathermather.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > https://smathermather.com/2017/02/18/taking-slices-from-lidar-data-part-viii/
>> 
>> You might use another filters.range to toss out high absolute scan angles, and then sample from the set you have left. This will bias your sampling to get keep more nadir'y points, which may or may not be what you're going after.
>> 
>> Howard
>> _______________________________________________
>> pdal mailing list
>> pdal at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pdal
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pdal/attachments/20170218/d1cd2e6d/attachment-0001.html>