[pdal] pdal pipeline filters.reprojection

[Stephen Mather]

Maxes out at 11... . No overlap.

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Howard Butler <howard at hobu.co> wrote:

> Are the overlap areas classified? The stats for Classification indicate a
> range of values...
>
> On Feb 18, 2017, at 9:23 PM, Stephen Mather <stephen at smathermather.com>
> wrote:
>
> Excellent idea, but I don't think this dataset includes scan angle:
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/3f5f5bbb9a3d55affea168620fbde6f1
>
> "average": 0,
> "count": 58768299,
> "maximum": 0,
> "minimum": 0,
> "name": "ScanAngleRank",
> "position": 9,
> "stddev": 0,
> "variance": 0
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Howard Butler <howard at hobu.co> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Feb 18, 2017, at 7:08 PM, Stephen Mather <stephen at smathermather.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > https://smathermather.com/2017/02/18/taking-slices-from-lida
>> r-data-part-viii/
>>
>> You might use another filters.range to toss out high absolute scan
>> angles, and then sample from the set you have left. This will bias your
>> sampling to get keep more nadir'y points, which may or may not be what
>> you're going after.
>>
>> Howard
>> _______________________________________________
>> pdal mailing list
>> pdal at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pdal
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pdal/attachments/20170218/e95079f4/attachment.html>