[pdal] Y_scale issue for LAS file

Miguel Guerrero g.miguel.guerrero.m at gmail.com
Wed Oct 16 10:22:41 PDT 2019


Man, two out of two!
Thanks again. The original data was in LAS version 1.0 and the resulting
LAS files are in 1.2.

Regards,

Miguel

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:35 AM Andrew Bell <andrew.bell.ia at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:25 PM Miguel Guerrero <
> g.miguel.guerrero.m at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Andrew!
>> You were right. I applied the scale obtained from the LAS header and I am
>> getting good results.
>> I am not sure if you have the answer for this one but, why are the
>> resulting LAS files (after sorting) a little bit bigger in size than the
>> originals?
>>
>
> I have no way of knowing without more information.  Assuming the point
> format/version is the same on input and output, different VLRs would
> account for a change in size.
>
> --
> Andrew Bell
> andrew.bell.ia at gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pdal/attachments/20191016/595a2fb5/attachment.html>


More information about the pdal mailing list