[pgrouting-users] pgRounting with PostGIS 2.0

[Luís de Sousa]

Hi Stephen and Daniel,

I'd be glad to contribute, I believe I can invest a few hours per week.
Besides that I'm working on a project where K-Shortest will be used, I can
try to source some funding around it.

Regards,

Luís


On 9 April 2013 15:56, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> The sew-devel-2_0 branch is what I'm currently working on. I do not have a
> release date because it depends on how much we decide to integrate into
> this branch and how much funding we can raise to support this effort.
>
> My general development goals is to try an make sure that at the end of
> each day (UTC-0500) that the branch is stable and compiles and builds on
> Linux and Windows.
>
> Currently it:
> * works with PostGIS 2.0
> * has had the source tree restructured to better support multiple devs
> * has TRSP merged into the tree
> * has had TSP solver replaced to remove GAUL dependency
> * has a new doc system integrated into the source tree
> * has a new test infrastructure integrated into the source tree
> * has some tests have been added to the source tree
> * has some bugs fixed
> * has some new graph analytic tools for detecting graph connectivity issues
> * installs as a postgresql extension on PG9.1+
> * has probably a few other things that I'm not remembering.
>
>
> Things that will change over time in this branch:
>
> * all functions will get a pgr_ prefix
> * all functions will get reviewed and probably restructured to be more
> consistent and allow users to easily switch between function
> * more algorithms from pull requests and GSoC projects will get pulled
> into the main respository
> * rewrite driving distance to drop CGAL and use postgis functions
>
> Look at this to get an idea:
> https://github.com/pgRouting/**pgrouting/wiki/2.0-**Development-Plan<https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/wiki/2.0-Development-Plan>
>
> You can see a lot has been done and there is a lot more to do. A lot of
> the infrastructure work has been tackled and some of the low hanging fruit
> has been picked. Any offers for funding would be greatly appreciated and
> could help accelerate and/or prioritize features.
>
> This is currently stable and fairly close to the 1.0.5 functionality so if
> you are inclined to give it a try we would love to here about on what works
> and doesn't, etc.
>
> Thanks,
>   -Steve
>
>
> On 4/9/2013 9:22 AM, Luís de Sousa wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel, thanks for the update.
>>
>> I know this is a tricky question, but is there any expected date for
>> this new release?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Luís
>>
>>
>> On 9 April 2013 13:05, Daniel Kastl <daniel at georepublic.de
>> <mailto:daniel at georepublic.de>**> wrote:
>>
>>     A new release is currently worked on.
>>     There is lots of discussion on the developer list and if you want to
>>     try out, you could checkout from Github repository and compile using
>>     the following branch:
>>     https://github.com/pgrouting/**pgrouting/tree/sew-devel-2_0<https://github.com/pgrouting/pgrouting/tree/sew-devel-2_0>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Pgrouting-users mailing list
>> Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.**org <Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-**users<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Pgrouting-users mailing list
> Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.**org <Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-**users<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-users/attachments/20130410/e3521338/attachment.html>