[postgis-devel] 1.3.3

[Paul Ramsey]

I can comment out the functions in sql.in and the documentation for
the point release, but as it stands they won't be available to anyone
who isn't running geos-svn in any event.

I too would rather have the behavior be "automagic" than do the
three-parameter overload.

Ben, any comments on the performance / implementation aspects?

P

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland
<mark.cave-ayland at siriusit.co.uk> wrote:

>  Okay. I'm not 100% convinced by the additional 3rd parameter here:
>  http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-commits/2008-January/000209.html.
>  I'd like to see evidence that avoiding the memcmp() will actually result
>  in a more than negligible performance boost, since it seems quite a hack
>  on the API :(  It would make sense to do this before we release the next
>  version and people start using the new API in earnest.