[postgis-devel] Issue 35 in postgis: Comments on Postgis Functions

[codesite-noreply at google.com]

Issue 35: Comments on Postgis Functions
http://code.google.com/p/postgis/issues/detail?id=35

Comment #7 by robe.... at cityofboston.gov:
Sorry about the 2.0.  I have changed it to 1.0.  I was meaning to use the  
replace
function introduced in xsl 2.0 and then realized we weren't using 2.0 and  
my IDE
parser wasn't using 2.0 either, so I fell on the 1.0 replace template hack,  
but
forgot to change the header back to 1.0.

Regarding the ST_AsKML issue.  Its a problem with all our functions that  
have more
than one function equivalent.  We have one synopsis for the whole entry so  
I am
copying the definition part from the synopsis - so is always the same for  
all.  Hmm I
was thinking we probably should have separate definitions for each  
function, but
thought that would be both more effort for documentors and not sure if its  
even
doable to stuff the comment in with the function prototype.  So sort of  
settled on
having the comment try to cover all permutations of functions in some shape  
or form.
  The ST_GeoJSON one would get especially hairy since there are I htink 7  
protos of that.



-- 
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings