[postgis-devel] About the ST_ prefix
strk
strk at keybit.net
Fri Jan 9 12:58:50 PST 2009
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:14:05AM -0500, Obe, Regina wrote:
> The thinking (who's thinking was this? Maybe Paul) was that it would be
> easier if people didn't have to
> worry about putting ST_ or not putting ST_ in front of functions.
Indeed I wouldn't worry and *never* use it, unless doing code supposed
to be portable across ISO-SQLMM standard dbs, in which case I'd only use
ST_ prefixed ones and count on them to be standard.
Beside, doesn't OGC expect non-prefixed ones ?
--strk;
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list