[postgis-devel] Database Architecture
OscarUK
oisink at btinternet.com
Tue May 4 11:43:43 PDT 2010
Many thanks
Any pointers on question 1, i.e. Does splitting the database across schemas
sound a sensible approach? Is it necessary etc.?
strk-2 wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 01:39:51AM -0700, OscarUK wrote:
>>
>> Hi forum users
>>
>> Please note I am a novice user.
>>
>> I wish to set up a very large PG database. For example, one 500x500km
>> square
>> had 60 million lines and 25 million polygons. However, at any one time
>> users
>> will be viewing or extracting only small areas, say 100m by 100m.
>>
>> Because of the database size, I intend to break this down into various
>> schemas within a single database. Where I need to grab map extracts
>> across
>> schemas, I hope to script views (or queries) on the fly that return the
>> required union between schemas.
>>
>> My questions are therefore:
>>
>> 1. Does this sound a sensible approach?
>> 2. How can I create a second schema that contains all the PG functions?
>> (When I create a new schema it contains no PG functions and I cannot work
>> out how to 'get them in').
>
> Postgis functions are tipically installed in the 'public' schema,
> as long as you have 'public' in your search_path you should find them.
>
> --strk;
>
> () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
> /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Database-Architecture-tp28434222p28451552.html
Sent from the PostGIS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list