[postgis-devel] sql.in.c do we like not like?

[Paul Ramsey]

I'm not indifferent because I don't like change for change's sake. Things were working before, let's leave them as they were. 

P. 

-- 
Paul Ramsey
http://cleverelephant.ca
http://postgis.net


On Friday, March 22, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Paragon Corporation wrote:

> 
> 
> > So it turned out that winnie-the-bot was just having one of her days...
> > It's now working just fine. Is there any real regression out there for me
> 
> 
> to look at ? Paul, anything on Mac ?
> > Anyone on a FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris ?
> 
> 
> 
> I think we still need to decide whether to put back the .c or not? At this
> point I'm indifferent since you explained it as plan to possibly get rid of
> C preprocessor.
> In which case I guess the .c would become a misnomer. So I'll give my +0.5
> for keeping it removed since you already went thru the work and I can't deal
> with another bot tantrum for at least another week.
> 
> 
> I'm still puzzled though why winnie's svn update did not delete the
> postgis.sql.in (http://postgis.sql.in) file. Unless it was somehow locked or in use.
> 
> Don't see anything different in the svn configuration between winnie and
> debbie. Please don't blame windows for this one.
> 
> Thanks,
> Regina
> http://www.postgis.us
> http://postgis.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org (mailto:postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org)
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel