[postgis-devel] How to recreate comments?
Nicklas Avén
nicklas.aven at jordogskog.no
Mon Sep 29 11:31:57 PDT 2014
I guess something is going on (or not going on ) in my installation. It
has worked before, or I wouldn't have had a working extension
installation.
When I run configure this is the last part of the status:
-------- Documentation Generation --------
xsltproc: /usr/bin/xsltproc
xsl style sheets: /usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh
dblatex:
convert:
mathml2.dtd: http://www.w3.org/Math/DTD/mathml2/mathml2.dtd
>
Then when I run make on a fresh checkout it ends with:
make[3]: Entering directory `/opt/dev/postgis/test/doc'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `comments'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/opt/dev/postgis/test/doc'
cp ../../doc/postgis_comments.sql sql_bits/postgis_comments.sql
cp: cannot stat ‘../../doc/postgis_comments.sql’: No such file or
directory
make[2]: *** [sql_bits/postgis_comments.sql] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/dev/postgis/test/extensions/postgis'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/dev/postgis/test/extensions'
make: *** [all] Error 1
Any ideas why it thinks there is nothing to do in doc?
Thanks
Nicklas
>
> Regina
>
> >
> >Hmm it should regenerate as part of the build process as long as the
> xml is
> >valid and comments in right spot. Are your comments regenerating at
> all?
> >Might be something wrong with your docbook or xsltproc install.
> >
> >If you want to check it in I can take a look. It just uses the
> refpurpose
> >tag element for comment description and the function proto stuff for
> the
> >args.
>
>
> What I did was that I changed the <paramdef> inside <funcprototype>
> to match the new version with default args in twkb.
> But that didn't trigger any recreation of the comments. I will take a
> look at my installation this evening.
>
>
> Is it ok if I just commit it otherwise. That breaks the build since
> the upgrade script won't work without the right comments (I
> experienced:-) )
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Nicklas
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >Regarding the create aggregate stuff, I fear you are right not much
> hope
> >there. I see raster ST_Union is done the same way as you describe --
> repeat
> >of transfn, aggs for each.
> >
> >Hope that helps,
> >Regina
> >http://www.postgis.us
> >http://postgis.net
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >postgis-devel mailing list
> >postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> >http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list