[postgis-devel] 2.2.0 passes regression tests on NetBSD 6 i386, perl path issue

[Greg Troxel]

Sandro Santilli <strk at keybit.net> writes:

> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:44:11PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> 
>> I updated the pkgsrc package from 2.1.7 to 2.2.0 and it passes
>> regression tests (pgsql 9.3.9, geos 3.5.0, proj 4.9.2).
>> 
>> Should I be foisting this on the pkgsrc-using world, or waiting until
>> 2.2.1?  It doesn't feel urgent if that's coming within weeks.
>> 
>> One of the things I notice in packaging is changes in the set of
>> installed files.   That's not a bug of course, but a chance to see if
>> the changes are entirely intended.
>> 
>> Extracts from a diff -u, with all the noise removed:
>> 
>>   +include/liblwgeom_topo.h
>>   +lib/postgresql/postgis_topology-2.2.so
>> 
>>   -share/postgresql/contrib/postgis-2.1/topology.sql
>>   -share/postgresql/contrib/postgis-2.1/topology_upgrade_21_minor.sql
>>   -share/postgresql/contrib/postgis-2.1/uninstall_sfcgal.sql
>>   -share/postgresql/contrib/postgis-2.1/uninstall_topology.sql
>> 
>>   +share/postgresql/contrib/postgis_topology-2.2/topology.sql
>>   +share/postgresql/contrib/postgis_topology-2.2/topology_upgrade.sql
>>   +share/postgresql/contrib/postgis_topology-2.2/uninstall_topology.sql
>> 
>> So there's a new header, and a new library - looks intended.
>> 
>> topology stuff in contrib is in a new subdir, compard to before, but the
>> comments file didn't move down.  That looks not clearly intended.
>
> No, it isn't intended. Could you please file a ticket ?
> It'll need to be taken care of both in 2.2 branch and trunk.

Finally filed, sorry for the delay:
  https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/3349
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 180 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20151026/66100139/attachment.sig>