[postgis-devel] PostGIS 3.0.0 RC1 delayed

[Paul Ramsey]

Could you or Myon write out a step-by-step: what do I do, and what do I see that’s wrong? Or post a patch? 
P

> On Oct 6, 2019, at 4:14 PM, Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
> 
> More  blockers
>  
> https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4515 <https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4515>
>  
> I upgraded that one to a blocker.  Originally I thought it was my local setup, but  Myon pointed out he’s having the same issue with building apt.postgresql.org <http://apt.postgresql.org/> packages.
>  
> Oh goody thanks Komzpa
> https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4525 <https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4525>
>  
> Thanks,
> Regina
>  
> From: Regina Obe [mailto:lr at pcorp.us] 
> Sent: Sunday, October 6, 2019 10:32 AM
> To: 'PostGIS Development Discussion' <postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: PostGIS 3.0.0 RC1 delayed
>  
> I was hoping we could release PostGIS 3.0.0 RC1 this weekend, but it seems there are some blockers standing in the way.
>  
> https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4522 <https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4522>  -- this got introduced with the array agg change between beta1 and RC1.  Only seems to affect 32-bit so maybe it shouldn’t be considered a blocker , but I fear it might signal something else wrong that 32-bit picks up on first because it has lower address range.
>  
> https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4521 <https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4521> - this was medium, but I changed to a blocker, because I thought we had already resolved this issue.  I haven’t had a chance to confirm if it’s still an issue or not.
>  
>  
> Thanks,
> Regina
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20191006/9c94a3f5/attachment.html>