[postgis-users] TIGER/Line Shapefiles released

[Stephen Woodbridge]

Yes, it would be ideal if it was handled by shp2pgsql but have you 
looked at:

http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&q=dbf2pgsql&btnG=Search
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&q=dbf2psql&btnG=Search
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&q=dbf2sql&btnG=Search

some of these might be helpful.

Best regards,
   -Stephen Woodbridge
    http://imaptools.com/

Paragon Corporation wrote:
> As a side note to what you were saying in the .sh file it would be really
> nice if the shp2pgsql dealt with standalone dbf files too.  I mean the logic
> is all there so doesn't seem like it would be that hard to put in a switch
> for that.
> 
> For the dbfs I was using Ogr2Ogr which works well except it adds a useless
> geometry field.
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
> [mailto:postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Stephen
> Frost
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 7:16 PM
> To: PostGIS Users Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-users] TIGER/Line Shapefiles released
> 
> * Stephen Frost (sfrost at snowman.net) wrote:
>> If anyone's interested in the scripts used to load the data (they're 
>> pretty simple, really), I'd be happy to provide them.
> 
> Alright, since it's apparently kind of popular, I went ahead and put the
> script up here:
> 
> http://snowman.net/tiger/
> 
> I also included a README.txt that is essentially what I wrote up to the
> first person who asked me for the script.  Please let me know if you improve
> upon it or find problems with it.
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 
> 		Stephen
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users