[postgis-users] need help optimizing spatial join / intersection query
Mark Phillips
mphillip at unca.edu
Wed Jun 18 13:36:19 PDT 2008
Thanks Paul. I just wanted a sanity check to make sure I was writing my
query in the best way possible.
The vertex counts of the rainfall polygons vary from 50 up to about 15000,
by the way.
--Mark
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>
wrote:
> Asked and answered? 15 minutes = 900 seconds / 12700 intersections =
> 70ms per intersection calculation. If your 10 rainfalls are fairly
> complex (what's the vertex count?) I don't think that's all that
> terrible. Removing the intersects() test will make things modestly
> faster, but not earth-shattering.
>
> P
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Mark Phillips <mphillip at unca.edu> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am a relative newcomer to postgis and am trying to figure out how to
> best
> > optimize an interesting query.
> >
> > I have two tables containing (multi)polygons, one representing drainage
> > basins, and the other representing rainfall amounts. The rainfall table
> has
> > an attribute giving the amount of rain in mm associated with each
> polygon.
> >
> > 'basin' table:
> > gid integer,
> > the_geom geometry
> >
> > 'rainfall' table:
> > gid integer,
> > the_geom geometry,
> > rainamount numeric
> >
> > I want to compute the total volume of rain in each basin by taking the
> > intersection of each basin with each rainfall polygon, multiplying the
> area
> > of that intersection by the rain amount value for the corresponding rain
> > polygon, and adding up all the resulting totals for each basin, storing
> the
> > result in a new table. I have spatial indexes on both tables, and I've
> > tried the following query using the && operator to make use of the
> indexes:
> >
> > create table basinrain as
> > select bgid,
> > sum(arearain) as totrain
> > from (
> > select b.gid as bgid,
> > r.gid as rgid,
> > r.rainamount * area(intersection(b.the_geom,
> > r.the_geom)) as arearain
> > from basin b,
> > rain r
> > where b.the_geom && r.the_geom
> > and intersects(b.the_geom, r.the_geom)
> > ) foo
> > group by bgid
> >
> > This seems to work just fine, but it is much slower than I would expect.
> My
> > basin table has about 2200 rows; their size and geometric complexity is
> > roughly comparable to US county polygons. The rain table has about 10
> rows,
> > but each one represents a pretty complicated multipolygon with (many)
> > holes. The query "select count(*) from basin, rain where basin.the_geom
> &&
> > rain.the_geom" executes very quickly and returns 12746, which I take to
> mean
> > that (a) my spatial indexes are in fact in place and working, and (b)
> there
> > are 12746 "possible" intersections to be computed in the bigger query
> > above. On a dual quad-core 3GHz Xeon system with nothing else going on,
> > though, the bigger query takes about 15 minutes to run, which seems to me
> > like a long time for computing 12746 intersections / areas. (I know that
> > comes out to an average of about 14 intersection/area computations per
> > second, which is way faster than I could do it by hand of course, but for
> > some reason I would expect it to be even faster than that.)
> >
> > Is this surprising to anyone else? Can someone suggest other ways to
> > optimize this?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > --Mark
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > postgis-users mailing list
> > postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20080618/d485d7a9/attachment.html>
More information about the postgis-users
mailing list