[postgis-users] shp2pgsql with DBF >= 2 GB?

[Paul Ramsey]

On 64bit machines it works. 

P.

On 2011-01-01, at 5:33 AM, Aren Cambre <aren at arencambre.com> wrote:

> It was raised there 4.5 years ago: http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463.
> 
> Might be nice if PostGIS maintainers could "bug" that developer about resolution?
> 
> The proposed local patch is changing int to long on three variables. While that may not be graceful, could it work as a temporary workaround?
> 
> Aren
> 
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland at siriusit.co.uk> wrote:
> On 01/01/11 06:46, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> 
> No workarounds. I thought there was a braindead patch on that ticket
> already, but it's not a patch I feel good enough to apply as a
> permanent fix.
> 
> P.
> 
> Yeah. Also since we've recently resynced with upstream shapelib, I'd much rather the issue is raised/fixed there and then we can just resync once again.
> 
> 
> ATB,
> 
> Mark.
> 
> -- 
> Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect
> PostgreSQL - PostGIS
> Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom
> http://www.siriusit.co.uk
> t: +44 870 608 0063
> 
> Sirius Labs: http://www.siriusit.co.uk/labs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20110101/ad07d4a8/attachment.html>