[Proj] rHEALPix new parameters

[Eric Miller]

Frank,

Did you have any thoughts on dealing with the minus zero problem in the test comparisons?  I guess some compilers (Intel, others?) will print "-0.00" in some cases which causes the textual comparison to "0.00" to fail.

See the message from "brick <brickflying at gmail.com>" on 9/27.
-- 

Eric G. Miller
Staff Programmer
CA Dept. of Fish & Game


>>> On 10/19/2011 at  1:54 PM, Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Michael Speth
> <spethm at landcareresearch.co.nz> wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>   How is the tv_out.dist file generated?
> 
> Michael,
> 
> The file is generated by running the script and renaming the
> output file after human review shows any diffs are due to newly
> added good results.
> 
> 
>>   Also, does Proj.4 have any conventions for indicating that a given
>> set of parameters for a projection are invalid?
> 
> I'm not sure how you mean.  In the cs2cs output?  In the code?  In
> the docs?
> 
> In the code for PJ_tmerc.c you can see how errors in +zone=
> values are reported with E_ERROR() during projection initialization.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>> Thanks for your help!
>>
>> On 18/10/11 15:41, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Michael Speth
>>> <spethm at landcareresearch.co.nz>  wrote:
>>>> Thank you Frank!
>>>>    I've added your recommended fixes and it works!  We will now start
>>>> thoroughly testing.  Do you have any suggestions for testing?
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>> Nothing deep, no.  But I would like to have a few representative
>>> test points to incorporate into proj/nad/testvarious so you might
>>> want to consider including that in the submission patch.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Speth
>> Scientific Programmer
>> Landcare Research
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Proj mailing list
>> Proj at lists.maptools.org 
>> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj 
>>
> 
>