[PROJ] PROJ 9.0.0RC1 & PROJ-data 1.9RC1

[Javier Jimenez Shaw]

One question. Is there an "automatic" way to know if there is an ABI (or
API) break, or is it just based on the developers' criterion?

What if there is such a break but we do not notice or forget or whatever?

Cheers,
Javier.

Mike Taves <mwtoews at gmail.com> schrieb am Do., 17. Feb. 2022, 11:01:

> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 22:35, Kristian Evers via PROJ
> <proj at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the thorough explanation, Bas. It's much appreciated!
> >
> > Even, Mike: I haven't got strong opinions on this. Do you guys think it
> is
> > worth the hassle to switch to the model Bas describes here?
>
> Thanks for the ideas Bas! I like it, as it's much simpler to see one
> incrementer.
>
> If we decide to keep the incremented SONAME, then yes, let's implement
> a simpler versioning for PROJ 9.0RC2. But if we decide to keep the
> previous SONAME (due to no API/ABI break), then keep it libtool-style
> until the next API/ABI break.
> _______________________________________________
> PROJ mailing list
> PROJ at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20220217/1c8345c0/attachment.html>