[Qgis-developer] API cleanup

Nathan Woodrow madmanwoo at gmail.com
Wed Dec 19 04:42:06 PST 2012


Hey Alex,

I think we should be removing them as I think that is a overall goal for
2.0.  I think we can just remove them.  We should be able to diff the API
docs once 2.0 is out to find out which methods have been added or removed.

That is my thinking anyway.

- Nathan


On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Alexander Bruy
<alexander.bruy at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> anyone works on API (both C++ and Python) cleanup? As I can see there
> are about 90 deprecated methods available (for example, look at
> QgsRasterLayer class), maybe we have even more, because not all
> methods may be marked as deprecated.
>
> Should we remove them? If yes which procedure is correct?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Alexander Bruy
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20121219/a6972fbc/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list