[Qgis-developer] New Vector API

Nathan Woodrow madmanwoo at gmail.com
Tue Apr 2 06:12:02 PDT 2013


Yeah if we could flick it on it would make a load of difference to how
clean the code is.

- Nathan


On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Matthias Kuhn <matthias.kuhn at gmx.ch> wrote:

> Hi Martin, hi List
>
> On 04.01.2013 22:19, Martin Dobias wrote:
> > Hi Matthias
> >
> > thanks for your mail.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Matthias Kuhn <matthias.kuhn at gmx.ch>
> wrote:
> >> You've been talking about updating to PyQt4 SIP version 2. I noticed
> this
> >> change did not yet happen. What are your plans regarding this update?
> > Yes, the plans are still there. I'm only wondering what would be the
> > best time to switch - right now within the branch or a bit later once
> > the branch is merged and the new code settles down a bit? I can see a
> > slight advantage of the latter approach of having a greater chance of
> > separating problems caused by the merge and problems caused by the SIP
> > API change, but I do not have a strong opinion here.
> >
> >
> Despite feature freeze, I'd like to ask what happened to that plan. As
> far as I know, this change has not been made, and if this change is not
> made before QGIS 2.0 it will have to wait for 3.0 (This is not something
> to be done for 2.1).
> It will probably be a small change (to switch in the core) but with a
> huge impace (concerning plugins).
>
> Matthias
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20130402/8f1f07a6/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list