[Qgis-developer] Digitizing behavior

[Denis Rouzaud]

not sure but to-be-commited features have negative IDs. It might be a 
reason they are rendered first.


On 08/20/2013 11:07 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> I think you described it wrong: the former is on the top and not the 
> latter. If the latter were at the top it would be more logical and 
> like the other GIS.
>
> I agree that the current QGIS behavior is strange and I wonder why 
> this happens. Aren't objects rendered by its order in a table unless 
> there are other rules?
>
> Andreas
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:48:16 +0200, Salvatore Larosa wrote:
>> I'm noticing that while digitizing a new feature which overlaps
>> another, the latter is at the top although I expect to see it at the
>> bottom, so the new feature should overlap to the existent one.
>>
>> I was wondering if this was the correct behavior since other GIS
>> software have a different behavior.
>>
>> Do you think we can change this for the upcoming 2.0?
>>
>> Best Regards
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer