[Qgis-developer] SEXTANTE: R output?

[Filipe Dias]

According to the release notes R > 3.0 should be faster than previous
versions with "big data" so I guess it would make sense to make it the
target version. However, most R users tend to wait a while to update. Would
it be to difficult to support both R>3.0 and R < 3 ?


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Il 10/07/2013 11:39, Victor Olaya ha scritto:
> > Yes, Filipe reported that and I hope I can fix it soon. I didn't have
> > much time these last days, but let's see if I can work on it later
> > today. Sorry for that
>
> thanks
>
> > p.s. One question: Is R 3.0 now more common than 2.x among R users?
> > Should we make 3.0 the target version in SEXTANTE?
>
> At least on Debian, yes:
> http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=r-base&searchon=names
>
> All the best.
> - --
> Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
> www.faunalia.eu
> Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
> Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.it/calendario
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlHdLNoACgkQ/NedwLUzIr4bBwCfX9MLuiOhmLcsIplQMBpLNwqo
> PSwAnjkmGv/eLmuwKCHhLHAuzTZqGtXw
> =cyHN
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20130710/3efac7cb/attachment.html>