[Qgis-developer] What's up with the 2.0.2 designation?

[Anita Graser]

I realize developers and packagers are stretched thin but I think we should
get the release right. Not fixing errors in the packaging is not what I
would think of when it was decided to not have bug fixing releases.
Best wishes
Anita
On Sep 26, 2013 8:49 PM, "Andreas Neumann" <a.neumann at carto.net> wrote:

> I know that you decided that there will be no dot releases. But as
> Giovanni already said there are some nasty problems like GRASS and SAGA
> broken for most people.
>
> This makes release 2.0 unusable for a number of people.
>
> I would recommend to make another release when the GRASS and SAGA
> integration is fixed on Windows and OSX.
>
> Andreas
>
> Am 26.09.2013 20:26, schrieb Jürgen E. Fischer:
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > On Thu, 26. Sep 2013 at 20:52:16 +0300, Alexander Bruy wrote:
> >> Maybe I miss something, but some time ago we decided that
> >> we can't maintain bugfix branches for the lack of resources.
> >>
> >> Is situation changed?
> >
> > No, not as far as I know.
> >
> > There has been talk about companies that maintaining own stable branch
> > contributing back to a stable branch.  But IIRC nothing definitive yet.
> >
> >
> >
> > Jürgen
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20130926/af6c79fe/attachment.html>