[Qgis-developer] Snapping tolerance

[Alexander Bruy]

+1 for map units, as this removes confusion

2014-12-13 9:35 GMT+02:00 Matthias Kuhn <matthias.kuhn at gmx.ch>:
> +1 for map units. Makes much more sense to me and should confuse less.
>
>
>
> On 12/13/2014 07:04 AM, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
>
> I think using the projects units makes more sense, Using the layer units
> makes things confusing I think, think of having one layer in degrees and
> another in meters.
>
> So +1 for swapping to mean project units.
>
> On Sat Dec 13 2014 at 4:02:10 PM Martin Dobias <wonder.sk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Recently I have been working on some snapping improvements (more about
>> that later) and I have found one slightly surprising thing about the
>> configuration of tolerances: if the tolerance unit is set to "map units", it
>> actually means "layer units" - i.e. units in layer's CRS and not in
>> project's CRS. Recently there was even a bug report filed for that:
>> https://hub.qgis.org/issues/11634
>>
>> I would like to change the behavior so that the "map units" in snapping
>> config dialog would mean units in project's CRS. Would there be any
>> objections?
>>
>> Alternatively we could just rename "map units" to "layer units" to make it
>> less surprising (and eventually add a third option to use project's units).
>>
>> Cheers
>> Martin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



-- 
Alexander Bruy