[Qgis-developer] TALK: Legend behaviour

Niccolò Marchi sciurusurbanus at hotmail.it
Thu Jul 17 00:44:26 PDT 2014

hi martin, thank you very much!

> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:54:09 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] TALK: Legend behaviour
> From: wonder.sk at gmail.com
> To: sciurusurbanus at hotmail.it
> CC: qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> Hi Niccolo
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Niccolò Marchi
> <sciurusurbanus at hotmail.it> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > two trivial thoughts about the legend behaviour:
> > - I don't know if I'm the only one, but I think the new way to move layers
> > with the "dragged image" is less comfortable and precise than the previous.
> > I found easier (and hence faster) to manage files in 2.2 legend when
> > appeared the line instead of having the actual image that covers the
> > destination and doesn't allow to see in a proper way where the file will be
> > put. Examples come mainly with: include/exclude a layer from a group or
> > moving a layer up to a group if the group is already on top;
> This could be probably changed... but there is also advantage in the
> new approach: you always know which layers/groups you move - in 2.2
> and earlier the layers that were being moved simply disappeared while
> being rendered.

so, maybe could be a good compromise to keep the actual render but a little more shifted out of the layer list, in order to show better the "destination line"? a sort of mix of the two approaches.

> > - other thing: is there a particular reason why, grouping some files, they
> > automatically go to the bottom of the legend? could it be a good idea (and
> > easy task) to group them where they are?
> Makes sense - implemented in master, c05e5e.
> Regards
> Martin

btw: many thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20140717/eb0467b4/attachment.html>

More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list