[Qgis-developer] Realease and blockers

[Nathan Woodrow]

The longer release time isn't for users its for us devs. After the feature
freeze is lifted features start going in adding more bugs. So a longer
release cycle with 2 months bug fix would allow for more polish.

This release was of course a major change adding some big stuff maybe we
just expand this one?
On Jun 6, 2014 7:47 PM, "Paolo Cavallini" <cavallini at faunalia.it> wrote:

> Il 06/06/2014 11:36, Régis Haubourg ha scritto:
> > BTW, the very short release cycle is really complicated for us. Deploying
> > prod version and testing new versions periods overshoot here. I'm alone
> on
> > that topic, and partial time only. Having longer release candidate
> period,
> > and a 6 months release cycle could help for me.
>
> I understand this. However, you are free to upgrade only if and when you
> have time
> for it, e.g. skipping every second version will give you an 8 months time
> frame.
> IMHO the fixed release cycle will help people planning in advance (yes,
> also the
> investment for bugfixing :) ).
> All the best, and thanks for your interest.
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20140606/6fa537f2/attachment-0001.html>