[Qgis-developer] Is the new release schedule a success?

[Nathan Woodrow]

Which is why we had a 2.8.1 not too long after proving the point of those
releases.

The one and only solution is more testing, there is no magic fix to any of
this.  Raising testing awareness and money is a good start.

On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:22 pm Tom Chadwin <tom.chadwin at nnpa.org.uk> wrote:

> > That is exactly why we have introduced long-term releases (LTR) for
> QGIS - for organizations that just need a stable QGIS for their work
>
> But the only .0 LTR so far (2.8) was not stable.
>
> > without having to worry about instabilities, testing and reporting bugs
>
> I understand that. I was simply replying to the call for more testing and
> reporting.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Is-the-new-release-schedule-a-success-tp5213659p5213793.html
> Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20150701/833943b8/attachment.html>