[Qgis-developer] Bug in symbol size data-defined override

[Anita Graser]

On Jun 8, 2015 10:03 AM, "Vincent Mora" <vincent.mora at oslandia.com> wrote:
>
> On 05/06/2015 16:46, Alexandre Neto wrote:
>>
>> I'm still at 2.8.1 (I have no administrator permissions on this machine)
>>
>> Using data-defined override on a marker symbol does not seem to be
working
>> as it should. Comparing a layer where the marker size is set to 50 and
>> another where we use 50 as an expression in data-defined override, they
do
>> not look the same, and I guess they should.
>>
>> Can anyone can confirm this, whether in 2.8 or in master?
>
> Is the size-scale method set to Diameter ? If it's not the case (i.e.
scale method area), then a square root is applied if the size is defined by
an expression.

It's left on default. So probably area. It's not clear for the user that
there is a connection between this seeing and data defined size.

Best wishes
Anita



>
> Cheers,
>
> V.
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alexandre Neto
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20150608/359b053f/attachment.html>