[Qgis-developer] Auto documentation commit hook

[Yves Jacolin]

Hello,

Some request, question:

1) A new request (or not): what if the code is reverted? Is it possible to add 
a comment in the document ticket?

2) About the new tag "Need docs": do we really want a new tag instead of just 
changing the tag to [Documentation] which could just mean "We need to document 
this for our user". 

Do we need to know the difference in the documentation ticket?

3) (no question here) **Thanks** to all for creating this hook! This is really 
nice now I can  try to work on some ticket each week.

Y.
On Friday, November 27, 2015 9:05:04 Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
> Currently the hook seems broken, I'll try to fix it this afternoon/evening.
> 
> Happy to do add the 'needs docs' tag too. Is this already a tag? Just
> sent me the exact tag text, and the type of issue that you want me to
> make for it in Documentation issue-list.
> 
> Matthias had also a feature request:
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Sysadmin/issues/3
> 
> Tim had another one.. which I forgot :-(
> Or is it: https://github.com/kartoza/projecta/issues/146
> 
> Have to see if I should put it in one script, or split it up. The one we
> use now is:
> 
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Sysadmin/tree/master/webhooks
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Richard
> 
> On 27-11-15 00:35, Alexandre Neto wrote:
> > Nyall, that would be useful. And GUI changes as well. In Docs we have
> > tags for identify the need to create new screenshots for users manual.
> > 
> > DelazJ <delazj at gmail.com <mailto:delazj at gmail.com>> escreveu no dia qui,
> > 
> > 26/11/2015 às 23:06:
> >     Hi,
> >     BTW, it's not against Documentation repo but could this also be used
> >     to fetch bug fixes so that a list of bug fixes can be generated to
> >     accompany qgis releases?
> >     
> >     2015-11-26 22:40 GMT+01:00 Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com
> >     
> >     <mailto:nyall.dawson at gmail.com>>:
> >         Hi all,
> >         
> >         Just a thought I had - could the new hook which creates a
> >         documentation issue when the message contains "feature" be
> >         amended so that it detects an additional "needs docs" tag too?
> >         
> >         My thoughts are that sometimes a change should be accompanied by
> >         documentation updates but isn't a new feature - eg, a GUI
> >         control being renamed or moved. It would be nice to be able to
> >         automatically flag these as something which needs addressing in
> >         the docs.
> >         
> >         Nyall
> >         
> >         
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Qgis-developer mailing list
> >         Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> >         <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
> >         List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >         Unsubscribe:
> >         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >     
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Qgis-developer mailing list
> >     Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
> >     List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >     Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer