[Qgis-developer] Plugin licence
Vincent Picavet (ml)
vincent.ml at oslandia.com
Wed May 25 04:26:02 PDT 2016
Hi,
On 25/05/2016 12:39, Even Rouault wrote:
[..]
> <my ow opinion, not pretending this is the project one>
>
> Technically you could licence the plugin with any license you want, but as
> soon you execute it against QGIS, it must be compatible of GPL v2+, since it
> is a derived work of QGIS GPLv2 code, and thus it must convey the same rights
> and obligations offered and constrained by the GPLv2 license.
> So you could also licence it under X/MIT, BSD 2/3 clauses or which ever other
> free licences that are compatible with GPLv2+.
> It cannot be under a proprietary license, because GPLv2 would impose to have
> access to the source code.
>
> The only cases where it makes sense in practice to have a plugin under a
> permissive license are :
> - imagine that someone would reimplement a QGIS alternative that would have
> the same API as QGIS but would be more permissively licensed, then it could
> make sense to have your plugin under that permissive license.
> - a more reasonable use case would be a plugin that would be compatible of
> QGIS and another proprietary GIS through some abstraction layer of their
> different APIs. The core of your plugin could then be permissively licensed to
> be compatible of both licensing models.
>
> </my ow opinion, not pretending this is the project one>
I do agree with this analysis.
Note that as for the Nvidia case mentionned, the Linux kernel has an
exception to GPL for proprietary modules. Not sure it plays a role on
the issue you mentionned, but it may be a strong difference with other
software which do not have this exception.
Vincent
>
>>
>> On Wed, 25 May 2016 8:01 pm Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it> wrote:
>>> Il 25/05/2016 11:42, Tom Chadwin ha scritto:
>>>> I guess I am just sceptical that GPL's requirement for GPL licensing of
>>>> a product, purely by virtue of importing the first product as a
>>>> library, is likely to hold much legal weight.
>>>
>>> We asked for legal advice, and that was the official response.
>>> All the best.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
>>> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
More information about the Qgis-developer
mailing list