[Qgis-developer] Status of QGIS3

Neumann, Andreas a.neumann at carto.net
Fri Jan 27 02:10:56 PST 2017


Hi Regis, 

Yes - we already publish our financials. Although in textual form: 

see
http://www.qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/finance/index.html 

I will perhaps cross-reference the financial reports on the page
explaining the sponsorship. Makes sense. 

The report for 2016 will soon be published. If you are interested, you
can find it already on Google Docs:  

Financial report 2016: 

https://docs.google.com/a/qgis.org/spreadsheets/d/18gwm83ENnIqNk0Hul-OlqggTHU4QeTqA-DvPmX8kK88/edit?usp=sharing


Budget proposal 2017: 

https://docs.google.com/a/qgis.org/spreadsheets/d/18gwm83ENnIqNk0Hul-OlqggTHU4QeTqA-DvPmX8kK88/edit?usp=sharing


Greetings,
Andreas 

On 2017-01-27 11:02, Régis Haubourg wrote:

>> It was my argument to "sell" the sponsorship to our users.
> 
> Good to know ! I probably could have sold that to my previous employer that way. So displaying a diagram explaining the average proportion of fund destinations on the sponsoring page could be great. Could be something like that "sponsoring funds generally go to: 
> (fake values) 60% bug fixing and infrastructure for quality, 20 % to developper meeting, 10% for documentation..."  
> 
> Cheers! 
> 
> Régis 
> 
> 2017-01-27 10:29 GMT+01:00 Neumann, Andreas <a.neumann at carto.net>:
> 
> Hi Régis, 
> 
> No, we did not change our policy regarding earmarked sponsoring. 
> 
> However, looking at our expenses, bug fixing is the biggest item (usually around 2/3 of the expenses). So you can easily claim that someones sponsorship covers that ;-) In reality, of course, everything goes into the pool. 
> 
> I also wrote "primarily" - that does not exclude that the money is also used for other purposes. 
> 
> It was my argument to "sell" the sponsorship to our users. 
> 
> Andreas
> 
> Just a question, up to now, sponsoring could not be oriented and I see that gold sponsor is dedicacted to bugfixing and QA. Did we change our policy? If yes, that needs to be wide spread, we might gain some sponsors ! 
> 
> Régis  
> 
> 2017-01-27 9:27 GMT+01:00 Neumann, Andreas <a.neumann at carto.net>:
> 
> Hi Paolo, 
> 
> Here are the slides from our annual meeting: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1d1ott7W5agb2vvUB8xSfv7x6gE843H-JLw4_OWqyTmc/edit?usp=sharing [1] 
> 
> However, only a small nr of slides on QGIS 3 itself. 
> 
> Feel free to re-use, if you need something. 
> 
> Andreas 
> 
> On 2017-01-27 08:05, Paolo Cavallini wrote: 
> Il 27/01/2017 07:42, Nyall Dawson ha scritto: On 27 January 2017 at 16:30, Neumann, Andreas <a.neumann at carto.net> wrote:
> 
> Obviously I missed a lot. I apologize. I was trying to be brief and
> concentrate on the very essential work necessary for QGIS 3. Every version
> obviously has plenty and numerous improvements, regardless if it is a major
> version change or not. Thanks a lot to all of the very active devs! 
> Just to clarify - I wasn't offended. I'm just very aware that there's
> a lot of "lurkers" on this list who could misinterpret your email and
> think that there's only been those changes so far. Next thing we know
> it's being shared on Twitter!

Thanks a lot Nyall, Andreas. This small incident IMHO highlights the
need for more communication to users, so our exercise may be useful.
Andreas, do you have slides to share?
Of course I'll also share mine.
All the best. 

_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer [2]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer [2]


  

Links:
------
[1]
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1d1ott7W5agb2vvUB8xSfv7x6gE843H-JLw4_OWqyTmc/edit?usp=sharing
[2] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20170127/37cfc4f4/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list