[QGIS-Developer] Processing 3.0: Possible change to the Convex Hull algorithm

G. Allegri giohappy at gmail.com
Wed Jun 28 01:07:48 PDT 2017


I would set them to null. In general I wouldn't change the dataset fields
schema along the processing steps, except in case of algorithms dedicated
to this.
The same happens with Dissolve.

giovanni

Il 28 giu 2017 09:53, "Nyall Dawson" <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> ha scritto:

> On 28 June 2017 at 14:42, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it> wrote:
>
> > If we use the boolean as you suggested, I think the default should
> > probably be all features.
>
> That's fine by me.
>
> Incidentally - how should we handle attributes here (and other similar
> algorithms)? Take the first feature's attributes? Drop all attributes?
>
> Nyall
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20170628/5b1a9810/attachment.html>


More information about the QGIS-Developer mailing list