[QGIS-Developer] discuss: What's our development gameplan for 3.0 and above?

[Nathan Woodrow]

Hey,

Personally, I like using the database wrapper that Qt provide and I don't
really see much risk in using it, to be honest.
We might get better speeds going to std route which is something to
consider but I prefer an easier API over raw speed unless it's massive
speed up.

Ideally, we really need to have our own database wrapper which can sit on
top of whatever implementation we choose.  This would also allow us to add
logging of all SQL commands that are run etc.

Regards,
Nathan



On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Tom Chadwin <tom.chadwin at nnpa.org.uk>
wrote:

> Having suffered at the hands of the QtWebkit thing, I would strongly agree,
> though I guess one airways needs to evaluate the health of any dependency -
> perhaps the are instances where a Qt class is better maintained than the
> alternatives.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> -----
> Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon
> --
> Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-
> f4099106.html
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20171110/8135f1e8/attachment.html>