[QGIS-Developer] Keeping OTB algorithm in qgis processing

[G. Allegri]

+1 also from me to the removal of the providers from core. IMHO I would
also remove GRASS, but I understand it could be a tough decision.
The provider system + plugin architecture provide all the means to keep
them separate from the core.

We all agree, I guess, that less is better then more, to guarantee the
highest quality we can afford.

Giovanni

Il 1 feb 2018 09:23, "Paolo Cavallini" <cavallini at faunalia.it> ha scritto:

> Hi Rashad,
>
> Il 31/01/2018 10:43, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto:
>
> > What I can propose is to lower the burden on maintenance but the code
> > should be put back to qgis if possible.
> > So qgis can focus on issue related only to that and after a while things
> > will stabilize.
> >
> > Indeed, if there is something broken in this algo otb team will help fix
> it.
>
> thanks for your offer, much appreciated. Would this include also the
> inclusion of OTB in the standalone installers for Windows? It would be
> good to make sure we always have the most appropriate version, both for
> 32 and 64 bit.
> All the best.
>
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
> https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20180201/03708b6b/attachment.html>