[QGIS-Developer] Where do we sit with respect to release?

Régis Haubourg regis.haubourg at gmail.com
Tue Jan 9 01:37:47 PST 2018


@Bernd, I don't want to open any can of worm :) . Reading again the
discussion where you ask for it, I realize that no decision was taken on
that BETA branding.

@Borys, thanks for the pointer. I'll see if Paul is available to merge
that.

Régis

2018-01-09 10:03 GMT+01:00 Borys Jurgiel <lists at borysjurgiel.pl>:

> On wtorek, 9 stycznia 2018 08:55:22 CET Régis Haubourg wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > given the small impacts and the benefit of emptying the PR queue, can we
> go
> > for a merge of https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5663 (named
> transactions
> > in executeSQL)?
> > I know we voted to not add it in the freeze exemptions, but that was in
> the
> > target of keeping a release date in end 2017. Now that time is passing,
> and
> > the hypothesis of a QGIS 3.0 "beta" being advertised, I think we should
> > have it in the release.
>
> A small correction: we definitely voted to add it (11:2), just Paul was
> opposed.
>
> https://www.loomio.org/p/EnrX0paG/-5663-add-a-name-for-
> transactions-created-from-executesql
>
> Regards,
> Borys
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20180109/b3a4a8c8/attachment.html>


More information about the QGIS-Developer mailing list