[QGIS-Developer] Last call for switching to github issue tracker

[Régis Haubourg]

Hi Loïc,
using both gitlab and github, I'd definitly would be in favor of gitlab,
which would allow us to host our own servers. That would imply a big task
switching travis to gitlab-ci.
Cheers
Régis


2018-01-12 18:21 GMT+01:00 L.Bartoletti <lbartoletti at tuxfamily.org>:

> On 12.01.2018 14:52, Denis Rouzaud wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
> Hi,
>
>> I'ld like to raise a last call to switch to github issue tracker before
>> the release.
>> I'd like to summarize briefly why.
>>
>> Pros (to me):
>> - integration with code and mainly with PR
>> - avoid multiplication of platforms
>> - so much more powerful (attachment, text formatting, referecing
>> issue/PR, pinging people, fitlering/searching/tagging, possibility to
>> plugin external issue management such as zenhub or others)
>> - so much more responsive, mobile friendy and easy to use
>>
> Totally +1
> When I show in formations where you have to / can make reports, ask
> questions, etc., the users - who are not all power users, far from it... -
> prefer user-friendly interfaces and a single source easily googleable.
> Apart from the different forums or stackexchange, GitHub is the best place
> to do this.
>
> - Github has a close-source [...] I guess it leads down to pragmatic vs
>> ethical matters.
>>
> Open question: How do you feel, (Have you ever had any thoughts), about
> migrate to gitlab (and using github as a mirror)?
>
> Regards.
>
> Loïc
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20180112/6126321d/attachment.html>