[QGIS-Developer] Should we disable Processing modeler for the next 3.4?

[Stefan Keller]

I have had problems QGIS 2.x.x versions with Processing time ago. Now
I hope to have time to test 3.4 these days.

Speaking about GRASS: It's a long time wish from me that there would
be a QGIS delivery (via Installers) where GRASS and SAGA are optional.
I've had so many experiences in teaching QGIS and I've seen so many
use cases where I wished to have a more slim QGIS without Java and
without such big sized libraries. Having said this, pls. let me add
that I'm using GRASS myself sometimes for certain analyses, and that I
appreciate GRASS and SAGA very much.

I'm chiming in with this wish because I think that this could be
related to separating adding and separating unit tests.

:Stefan


Am Di., 11. Sep. 2018 um 09:44 Uhr schrieb Luigi Pirelli <luipir at gmail.com>:
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 01:06, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hell no! (no wait, that's not strong enough...! #$%#$% no!!!) ;)
>
>
> ;) I know my mail was a bomb!
>
>>
>> I think the issue with grass is more to do with "running more than one
>> GRASS algorithm in a single qgis session".
>
>
> that's could be a problem... but probably not in my use case.
>
>>
>> > 2) There are not so many users moving models to 3.x => many use cases are not covered yet.
>>
>> Yes, many use cases are definitely not covered yet. But I don't think
>> these are regressions, just missing features/functionality  (let me
>> know if they are regressions).
>
>
> I tried to avoid completely to use 2.18 version also to face all possible issue and trying to fix them, so I can't say if it's a regression.
>
> cheers
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer