[QGIS-Developer] No LTR on SUSE repos
Régis Haubourg
regis.haubourg at gmail.com
Mon Apr 8 08:28:43 PDT 2019
Hi Yann
We are tallking about going towards official docker for desktop use here :
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/142
It might be an option, I have all my QGIS versions running with this option
on Ubuntu, just because running different versions at the same time is a
pain in Linux. We do this frequently for production uses with QGIS server,
and it seems to be working with Desktop, though we still need to test and
document it thoroughly. Of course other container options are here (flapak,
snap, conda) and I just can't give any advice on these other options as I
don't use them.
The other option is to support (in the long term) someone to package QGIS
for Suse.
Cheers Régis
Le lun. 8 avr. 2019 à 17:22, Yann POUFFARIX <yann.pouffarix at eveha.fr> a
écrit :
> For now, I'm actually trying to do it myself... for up to 200+ users in my
> company.
>
> A valid rpm package was available on repositories and suddenly disapear
> and i've found no explication.
>
> Some dependencies required by Qgis were provided by Qgis repository and...
> disapear.
>
> There is no objection to dev or anything we can do to improve Qgis but
> there is a point that we can't count, the fluctuant repository to install
> packages and that mean if we finnaly build a proper rpm , we'll distribute
> it by our on way because we can't predict what apend in the future.
> Le lun. 8 avr. 2019 à 10:35, Alessandro Pasotti <apasotti at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 10:25 AM Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Yann,
>>>
>>> On 08/04/19 10:01, Yann POUFFARIX wrote:
>>> > Back in time.
>>> >
>>> > No answer from maintener and of course nothing listed here
>>> >
>>> > https://software.opensuse.org/package/qgis-ltr
>>> >
>>> > what to do x)
>>>
>>> I think you are left with the choice of either doing the package
>>> yourself, or hire someone to do it. Of course you can always compile
>>> qgis yourself, it shouldn't be too hard if the dependencies are properly
>>> packaged.
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>>
>> Just curious: why should we invest money for Apple packaging and not for
>> SuSE packaging?
>>
>> I think we should be inclusive and supportive for all users on all
>> platforms.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
>>> QGIS.ORG Chair:
>>> http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>>> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alessandro Pasotti
>> w3: www.itopen.it
>> _______________________________________________
>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20190408/6d12b021/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the QGIS-Developer
mailing list